I don’t like the fact that there are rumors floating around that Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have split up one bit! I didn’t even hear about rumors of these two being in trouble until I read a denial of the rumor from Reese’s camp. Apparently, the two are fine and the rumors are not true. But I don’t know. Once rumors start, usually sooner or later with things like this, they turn out being true a couple of months down the road. And the two have been pretty quiet about their relationship, up until just lately. I had thought that was a sign that they really were starting to become very, very serious and so, ready to start showing that love more. Hopefully, I’m right and this really is just an ugly rumor. From US,
“Contrary to reports elsewhere Sunday, Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have not broken up. A rep for Witherspoon, 33, tells Usmagazine.com: “It’s not true. They have not split.”
The actress met Gyllenhaal, 28, while filming 2007’s Rendition, and the pair stepped out together, confirming their relationship in summer 2008.
In the April 2009 issue of Elle, the actress gushed about Gyllenhaal. “He’s fabulous. He really is a fantastic guy.”
Witherspoon divorced actor Ryan Phillippe in 2007 after eight years together; they have two children: Ava, 10, and Deacon, 6. After two years together, Gyllenhaal and girlfriend Kirsten Dunst called it quits in 2004.
Witherspoon told Parade magazine last year, “Things change..But your ability to love remains intact. Oh, I have a lot of hope for love! I do!”
Reese does always seem so positive and hopeful, doesn’t she? Even when she was going through that nasty divorce with that nasty Phillipe. But I really hope that any rumors of Reese and Jake really are just rumors that they are laughing away together. I love these two together so much and it seems as though they’ve worked really hard, and really slowly, at making their relationship what it is. And Reese really was gushing about him just last month. So who knows. But I’m keeping my fingers crossed for these two.
- None Found